"Feed" has been an amazing story that has kind of left me puzzled in the end of the novel. In this story, Link has learned that the feed isn't needed to control our lives. There is no need for human intelligence to be determined by a computer chip. I feel that the computer chip can to relate to life as someone who wants to take control. Maybe it's a metaphor for something that tries to be controlling. And in the story, the author is trying to tell us that no matter how strong our powerful someone or something may be, we, the people, will always and should always be able to have control over ourselves. In the story, there are people called "hackers" who were able to take the computer and use it to accomplish a task the "hacker" will want accomplished. This may show that sometimes, we can not always have complete control over ourselves. But this story proves to show that in no matter what time period, future or past we live in, humanity has control over there own fate.
This story is a great book and I completely recommend it to someone who is curious to what life may be like if we were controlled by manufactured intelligence. But there are still questions that may need answering that are rumbling through my mind.
1. Will life and human intelligence forever remain controlled by ourselves in the real world?
2. Is it possible that later in life, people will need a computer to run our natural life?
3. Is fate determined by manufactured intelligence in the life with a "feed"?
